Administration to broaden contraception accommodation for religious groups

Administration to broaden contraception accommodation for religious groups
By JOANNE KENEN | 7/22/14 POLITICO

The Obama administration will create a new option for certain religious nonprofits that object to both the Obamacare contraception mandate and the earlier administration efforts to find accommodation for them, according to a court document filed Tuesday.

The brief filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit says the administration is broadening the accommodation policy after the Supreme Court ruled that Wheaton College, a religious institution, did not have to provide contraception in employee health plans while the issue makes its way through the courts. Details were not spelled out.

The legal issues surrounding religious nonprofits are separate from the recent Hobby Lobby ruling by the Supreme Court. In Hobby Lobby, the court ruled that certain family-owned for-profit businesses did not have to provide birth control in employee health plans if it violated their religious beliefs. The cases involving religious nonprofits are still before the courts.

Wheaton and some other groups, such as an order of nuns in Denver, objected to filling out a form that would trigger the accommodation process – which would still guarantee that women get the contraception coverage, but without direct involvement of the employer. This will provide an alternative, although an administration official said it would take about a month to issue a new rule.
“This is part of ensuring that all women have access to contraception coverage,” a senior White House official said. “The administration believes the accommodation is legally sound,” but the administration will still broaden the policy.

“The Wheaton College injunction does not reflect a final Supreme Court determination that RFRA [Religious Freedom Restoration Act] requires the government to apply the accommodations in this manner,” the brief said. But the administration decided to move ahead.

Governor approves hire of 100 new child protective service workers


Governor approves hire of 100 new child protective service workers
July 16, 2014

Deal: Recent influx of cases required immediate action to protect Georgia children, improve system

Gov. Nathan Deal today approved the hire of 100 new child protective service workers to assist with a recent influx of cases. The number of reports of child abuse and neglect has significantly increased since the opening of a centralized 24/7 Child Protective Services Intake Communications Center.

"If we do nothing else, we must always do everything in our power to ensure that our children are safe and that they get their best shot at a good life," Deal said. “Since June of last year, we have seen a 63 percent increase in the number of investigations and family support cases. I saw it necessary to hire 100 new workers, in addition to the 175 included in this year’s budget. No child welfare case should ever lack the attention it so greatly deserves. Supplemental personnel will better equip our state to manage recent demand and help us reach our goal of a 15:1 caseload to caseworker ratio — a nationwide best practice — by 2017.”

Funding for additional personnel will be included in the governor’s amended FY15 budget.
"Over the last several months, Georgia DFCS has experienced a dramatic increase in the number of reports of child maltreatment,” said Bobby Cagle, interim director of the Division of Family and Children Services. “These 100 new positions, in addition to the 175 previously committed and hired July 1, will allow us to quickly improve safety for vulnerable children throughout the state. I greatly appreciate Governor Deal's leadership in recognizing the pressing need and quickly allocating additional staff."

The governor will continue to evaluate the ratio between number of caseworkers and caseload on an ongoing basis.

Supply won't meet growing demand for primary care

Supply won't meet growing demand for primary care

Kaitlyn Krasselt and Jayne O'Donnell, USA TODAY   June 30, 2014

Federally funded programs will add at least 2,300 new primary care practitioners by the end of 2015, but the funding for at least one of those programs is set to expire at the same time, contributing to a massive shortage of doctors available to treat patients — including those newly insured through the Affordable Care Act and Medicare.

The U.S. is expected to need 52,000 more primary care physicians by 2025, according to a study by the Robert Graham Center, which does family medicine policy research. But funding for teaching hospitals that could train thousands more of these doctors expires in late 2015.

Population growth will drive most of the need for family care doctors, accounting for 33,000 additional physicians, the study says. The aging population will require about 10,000 more. The Affordable Care Act is expected to increase the number of family doctors needed by more than 8,000, the study says.

Farzan Bharucha, a health care strategist with consulting firm Kurt Salmon, says the ACA should have focused more on the primary care shortage "because we already knew there was a problem -- and we knew implementation of ACA would potentially make it worse."

Health and Human Services spokeswoman Erin Shields Britt says continuing to build the primary care workforce will take time, but she notes President Obama's budget working its way through Congress has several new ways to expand the primary care workforce, which includes nurse practitioners and pediatricians. The ACA, she says, significantly increases the number of primary care providers in underserved areas and increases Medicare and Medicaid payment for services delivered by primary care practitioners.

ACA funding that added 600 new primary care residencies was part of a five-year investment that expires at the end of 2015, eliminating the chance to produce hundreds more doctors each year.

But many agree far more needs to be done. Among the issues:

• Other medical residency funding. More oversight is needed in the distribution of the current $12 billion in federal graduate medical education (GME) funding, which is used for medical residencies, says Bob Phillips with the American Board of Family Medicine. Hospitals can decide the kind of residencies to create and tend to train and hire specialists who bring in more revenue than primary care doctors, he says. HHS says reform is needed, but that it doesn't have authority to make program changes since the GME formula is determined by Congress.

• Rising cost of medical school. For the class of 1992, the median education debt was $50,000. In 2012, it was $170,000, according to a 2012 Association of American Medical Colleges study. Gina Martin, who is finishing her primary care residency and plans to practice in rural Delta, Colo., says she faces $250,000 in medical school debt, which made her choice more difficult.

• More lucrative specialty care. Payment rates for Medicare and Medicaid — the largest payers for primary care by far — tend to reward specialty, interventionist care over prevention, primary care and diagnosis, says health care consultant Kip Piper. Family physicians made an average of $175,000 in 2012, the third lowest of any doctor, according to the MedScape annual physician compensation report.

• Scope of practice laws. States regulate and license doctors and have been slow to embrace the idea that non-physicians could take over some of the functions. Nurse practitioners and physician assistants should be performing vaccinations and strep tests, Bharucha says.
Despite the challenges, Martin says her intention to pursue the field has never wavered. "I grew up in a system and I'm now training in a system that works toward keeping people as healthy as possible," she says.